Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130225213400.GF3849@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-02-25 22:27:21 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Why? The concrete usecase is having some form of nesting available for a shared_library. shared_preload_libraries = 'bdr' bdr.connections = 'a, b' bdr.a.dsn = '...' bdr.a.xxx = '...' bdr.b.dsn = '...' > There are no multilevels structures in pg. Variables should be joined > with schemas or extensions. Other levels are messy. So? What does the one existing level SQL have to do with postgresql.conf? And why is it messy? Not that as I said before SET foo.bar.blub = '1'; currently is already allowed. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: