Re: PostgreSQL binaries under /usr/lib, why?
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL binaries under /usr/lib, why? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130222132940.GQ16142@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL binaries under /usr/lib, why? (Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
* Rafael Martinez (r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no) wrote: > i.e. pgbench, pg_archivecleanup, pg_upgrade, initdb and several others > are not available via /usr/bin and they should not be defined as low > level. initdb is wrapped through pg_createcluster and friends. pg_archivecleanup probably isn't something you want to have changing under your existing installation, assuming you install it as archive_cleanup_command for a given PG version. pgbench is a bit of an oddball and I suppose it could go either way on that one. > Having *all* binaries installed by a postgres package accessible via > /usr/bin and wrappers would make live easier for many users. pg_ctl, initdb, etc, are handled through pg_createcluster and friends and using them independently will very likely cause a lot of grief for new users. In short, I'm pretty happy with the choices that Martin's made wrt what to wrap and how, though I do understand that it can be a bit jarring for advanced users who are coming from other distributions that don't have the same level of infrastructure that Ubuntu/Debian have, or for users who have been compiling from source. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: