Re: Materialized views WIP patch

On 2013-02-21 04:14:09 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > More generally, I would consider the invalidation of a materialized view
> > a DDL command, whereas truncating a table is a DML command.
> 
> That's not entirely true. From the database's point of view, TRUNCATE
> is in many ways actually DDL.
> 
> I actually don't really dislike using "TRUNCATE" for this command. I
> was more asking about whether this meant people were thinking of the
> view as a thing where you could control the data in it by hand and
> could have the view be "empty" rather than just "not valid".

It also might get confusing when we get materialized views that are
auto-updateable. I am not suggesting to forward TRUNCATE to the internal
storage in that case but giving an error so its an easy to find
distinction to a normal table seems like a good idea.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services