Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130219223116.GA4158@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum
stress-testing our system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra wrote: > AFAIK the stats remain the same within a transaction, and as a function > runs within a transaction, it will either get new data on the first > iteration, or it will run all 300 of them. I've checked several > buildfarm members and I'm yet to see a single duration between 12ms and > 30sec. No, there's a call to pg_stat_clear_snapshot() that takes care of that. > I'm really wondering how that could happen. The only thing that I can > think of is some strange timing issue, causing lost requests to write > the stats or maybe some of the stats updates. Hmmm, IIRC the stats are > sent over UDP - couldn't that be related? yes, UDP packet drops can certainly happen. This is considered a feature (do not cause backends to block when the network socket to stat collector is swamped; it's better to lose some stat messages instead). -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: