Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
От | Martin Pitt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130219160156.GJ3033@piware.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to
apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
|
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Magnus Hagander [2013-02-19 16:40 +0100]: > Unfortunately, it will take quite a while to propagate, no? Yes, but it took a long time to set up apt.p.o, and the PPA won't disappear anytime soon anyway. This is also something which we can backport to 12.04 LTS, and 10.04 LTS' lifetime isn't that long any more anyway. For Debian, there's a good chance we can get it into the next release (wheezy); it's in deep freeze, but that's a low-risk change. > What we were considering was using a curl | sudo bash basically. It > will then be signed by our main SSL certificate, so that should be > almost as trustworthy as a package signature (ours would be > exploitable by somebody tricking a public CA into giving them a cert > for www.postgresql.org) That seems fine indeed. There's nothing wrong with having more than one way -- if you have the local script, use that, otherwise use above approach? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: