Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130217054654.GB6000@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum
stress-testing our system
Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra wrote: > I've been thinking about this (actually I had a really weird dream about > it this night) and I think it might work like this: > > (1) check the timestamp of the global file -> if it's too old, we need > to send an inquiry or wait a bit longer > > (2) if it's new enough, we need to read it a look for that particular > database - if it's not found, we have no info about it yet (this is > the case handled by the dummy files) > > (3) if there's a database stat entry, we need to check the timestamp > when it was written for the last time -> if it's too old, send an > inquiry and wait a bit longer > > (4) well, we have a recent global file, it contains the database stat > entry and it's fresh enough -> tadaaaaaa, we're done Hmm, yes, I think this is what I was imagining. I had even considered that the timestamp would be removed from the per-db file as you suggest here. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: