Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130216013854.GD12029@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to
apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA |
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:51:45PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > > (2) Problem with general process > > > > The instructions expressed on the page involve 6 steps, three of which > > require editing text files with persnickety syntax, thus requiring an > > intimate knowledge of Debian packaging, and mapping your numerical > > release number to the "cute" release names, and rearranging lines of a > > large complex system-generated file, and messing with repository keys. > > > not sure what the "intimitate knowledge requirement" here is - pasting > exactly the strings proposed is enough and there is not a single > requirement on understanding debian packaging, though i have to admit > that NOT understanding it is kinda a sign that you should not have root > on the debian based box you are on and you are an admin for. I don't think "codename" is really good wording here: Edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pgdg.list, and add a line for the repository, substituting the proper "codename" for your release deb http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ precise-pgdg main Shouldn't we highlight where that name goes? I am running Squeeze and though I know "precise" is a code-name, I found out only by accident. I particularly think users will not recognize codenames of Debian release newer than their own. I suggest this wording: Edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pgdg.list, and add a line for the repository, substituting the proper Debian release name: http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ <i>release-name</i>-pgdg main Also, we should tell users how to find their release name. I looked on Debian and I can't even find out how to find the name, though I know it is Squeeze. I am using Ubuntu 12.04 on my laptop and I don't know the release name of that, nor do I know how to find it. Also, can't we change this to use a shell? Package: * Pin: release o=apt.postgresql.org Pin-Priority: 500 as in: sudo cat > /etc/apt/preferences.d/pgdg.pref <<END Package: * Pin: release o=apt.postgresql.org Pin-Priority: 500 END That avoids requiring them to start an editor as root, which we don't even mention. Folks, we shouldn't be requiring decoder rings here to install Postgres --- we have to do better. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: