Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken?
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130215015229.GD16126@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? (Jeffrey Jones <jjones@toppan-f.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken?
Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? (SOLVED...but how?) |
Список | pgsql-general |
* Jeffrey Jones (jjones@toppan-f.co.jp) wrote: > I downloaded http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/redhat/rhel-6Server-x86_64/rep= odata/primary.sqlite.bz2 > using wget on the afected computer and ran md5sum over it with the > following result: >=20 > 9258bd5672cf7abb55a0d95ee2467afc primary.sqlite.bz2 That's pretty cute. I get: sfrost@tamriel:/home/sfrost> md5sum primary.sqlite.bz2 168232945d791e55e56bb29757458157 primary.sqlite.bz2 Which matches an md5sum run on the file on the server directly and the file timestamp indicates that it hasn't changed for ~2 days. Have you tried opening the file you end up receiving and inspecting it? Something is clearly off if you're getting a different md5sum. > I have downloaded it from a few separate computers and they all > return that same result. Can you try from a system that isn't attached to your corporate network? > I also extracted and looked at the sqlite file with sqliteman and > it worked without trouble. If there really was a problem then I > would have expected sqliteman to fail reading the file. Agreed, that's curious- perhaps there's a cacheing transparent proxy in the corporate network that's feeding you an older, but otherwise valid, file? Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: