Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
От | Martin Pitt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130214094416.GI3042@piware.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to
apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA |
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Christoph Berg [2013-02-14 10:29 +0100]: > I see the point. The behavior is in line with backport.debian.org's > "principle of least surprise", i.e. you will only get upgraded to > these packages if you explicitely ask for it. For Ubuntu PPA users the > expectation might be the other way round ("I configured the repo, so > please take over my system") - I'm not sure which way is the better > one to default to. Debian/Ubuntu backports potentially affect the whole system, so almost every user will only want to pick a package or two, not all of them. Also, the point of those "NotAutomatic" flag was that you can even add the apt source by default everywhere. Most PPAs, as well as apt.pg.org are "topic" repositories which IMHO you would usually enable because you want to use them. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: