Re: pgsql: Move Assert() definitions to c.h
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Move Assert() definitions to c.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130201225543.GB27969@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Move Assert() definitions to c.h (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 2013-02-01 19:44:42 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > > Move Assert() definitions to c.h > > > > This seems a bit odd. Why didn't you move all of postgres.h's section 3 > > into the new section in c.h? The couple of declarations you left there > > are neither useful nor intelligible on their own. > > Hmm, true, I didn't consider that. Will fix. I left it there because assert_enabled and ExceptionalCondition should never be required in a frontend environment. Wasn't sure about that one, so moving it is absolutely fine with me. > > > > Also, I think there's a typo here: > > > > +#else /* USE_ASSERT_CHECKING && FRONTEND */ > > > > Should be > > > > +#else /* USE_ASSERT_CHECKING && !FRONTEND */ > > > > no? > > This bit I did consider. It wasn't clear to me whether those comments > mean that the condition spelled out in the comment holds for the lines > below, or that they hold for the lines above. Note the comment after > the #endif holds for the lines above it. > > After searching for precedent, I found one in ip.c and it seems to > support what you say. I think there exists precedent for both spellings, don't really about which one we use here. One other thing I didn't think of, if youre at it agan, what about changing the #ifndef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING definition of #define Assert(condition) into #define Assert(condition) ((void)true) That makes for fewer warnings on some pedantic compiler modes and is in line with C's assert() IIRC. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: