Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130125184143.GF6848@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:35:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > I have applied a modified version of your patch that creates separate > > secondary index references for search_path. > > This patch seems pretty bizarre. What is the difference between a > "configuration parameter" and a "run-time setting"? Why would you > point people to two different places for those two terms? I think he is trying to distinguish between the parameter and the setting of the parameter, and also its use for security. No one really replied to the email so I thought the distinction was accpetable. Should I make them both "configuration parameter" and leave the "security" as a second one separate? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: