Re: BUG #6528: pglesslog still referenced in docs, but no 9.1 support

Bruce Momjian escribi=F3:
>=20
> On Tue, Sep  4, 2012 at 02:01:54PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep  4, 2012 at 12:49:40PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep  4, 2012 at 12:11:53PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > > =20
> > > >> What do you think would be the right thing to do with it at this
> > > >> point?
> > > >=20
> > > > Well, there should probably be a tar files with a README.  What
> > > > about adding this to /contrib?
> > > =20
> > > I would be happy to add it to contrib if people want it there.=20
> > > There was some discussion of that when I wrote it, but then there
> > > was a feeling that it would be uninteresting once people had
> > > streaming replication.  I'm skeptical that people will ever lose
> > > interest in archiving WAL files, because of the not-uncommon need t=
o
> > > keep archival backups or restore to a "point in time" to recover
> > > from a mangled table.  As long as those needs are there, I suspect
> > > that people will want to compress WAL files, including making
> > > partially-filled files smaller.
> >=20
> > Agreed.  Please move forward on the contrib idea.
>=20
> Kevin, did this get accomplished?

Just to be clear, what we're proposing adding to contrib is
clearxlogtail, not pglesslog, right?

--=20
=C1lvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services