Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130123185824.GB23670@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> writes: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [rhaas pgsql]$ pg_isready -h www.google.com > >> <grows old, dies> > > > Do you think we should have a default timeout, or only have one if > > specified at the command line? > > +1 for default timeout --- if this isn't like "ping" where you are > expecting to run indefinitely, I can't see that it's a good idea for it > to sit very long by default, in any circumstance. FYI, the pg_ctl -w (wait) default is 60 seconds: from pg_ctl.c: #define DEFAULT_WAIT 60 -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: