Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130123171908.GB22758@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:04:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> IMHO that's the single most important task of a review. > > > Really? I'd say the most important task for a review is "does the patch > > do what it says it does?". That is, if the patch is supposed to > > implement feature X, does it actually? If it's a performance patch, > > does performance actually improve? > > > If the patch doesn't implement what it's supposed to, who cares what the > > code looks like? > > But even before that, you have to ask whether what it's supposed to do > is something we want. Yep. Our TODO list has a pretty short summary of this at the top: Desirability -> Design -> Implement -> Test -> Review -> Commit -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: