Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130118182156.GF16126@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 2013-01-18 12:45:02 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > 'Template' seems like a really broad term which might end up being > > associated with things beyond extensions, yet there are a number of > > places where you just use 'TEMPLATE', eg, ACL_KIND_TEMPLATE. Seems like > > it might become an issue later. > > I think Tom came up with that name and while several people (including > me and I think also Dim) didn't really like it nobody has come up with a > better name so far. 'Extension Template' is fine, I was just objecting to places in the code where it just says 'TEMPLATE'. I imagine we might have some 'XXX Template' at some point in the future and then we'd have confusion between "is this an *extension* template or an XXX template?". Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: