Re: Materialized views WIP patch
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130116172050.162420@gmx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Materialized views WIP patch ("Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn@mail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Materialized views WIP patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thom Brown wrote: > Some weirdness: > > postgres=# CREATE VIEW v_test2 AS SELECT 1 moo; > CREATE VIEW > postgres=# CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_test2 AS SELECT moo, 2*moo FROM > v_test2 UNION ALL SELECT moo, 3*moo FROM v_test2; > SELECT 2 > postgres=# \d+ mv_test2 > Materialized view "public.mv_test2" > Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description > ----------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+------------- > moo | integer | | plain | | > ?column? | integer | | plain | | > View definition: > SELECT "*SELECT* 1".moo, "*SELECT* 1"."?column?"; You are very good at coming up with these, Thom! Will investigate. Can you confirm that *selecting* from the MV works as you would expect; it is just the presentation in \d+ that's a problem? Thanks, -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: