Re: Parallel query execution
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel query execution |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130116022901.GA369@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel query execution (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:11:20AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > I mentioned last year that I wanted to start working on parallelism: > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Parallel_Query_Execution > > Years ago I added thread-safety to libpq. Recently I added two parallel > execution paths to pg_upgrade. The first parallel path allows execution > of external binaries pg_dump and psql (to restore). The second parallel > path does copy/link by calling fork/thread-safe C functions. I was able > to do each in 2-3 days. > > I believe it is time to start adding parallel execution to the backend. > We already have some parallelism in the backend: > effective_io_concurrency and helper processes. I think it is time we > start to consider additional options. > > Parallelism isn't going to help all queries, in fact it might be just a > small subset, but it will be the larger queries. The pg_upgrade > parallelism only helps clusters with multiple databases or tablespaces, > but the improvements are significant. > > I have summarized my ideas by updating our Parallel Query Execution wiki > page: > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Parallel_Query_Execution > > Please consider updating the page yourself or posting your ideas to this > thread. Thanks. > > Honestly that would be a great feature, and I would be happy helping working on > it. > Taking advantage of parallelism in a server with multiple core, especially for > things like large sorting operations would be great. > Just thinking loudly, but wouldn't it be the role of the planner to determine > if such or such query is worth using parallelism? The executor would then be in > charge of actually firing the tasks in parallel that planner has determined > necessary to do. Yes, it would probably be driven off of the optimizer statistics. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: