Re: Index build temp files
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index build temp files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130109022548.GJ16126@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index build temp files (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index build temp files
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > On 9 January 2013 00:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I don't think it's a bug. What you seem to be proposing is that CREATE > >> INDEX ought to ignore temp_tablespaces and instead always put its temp > >> files in the tablespace where the finished index will reside. > > > I don't think that's what he said. > > Then I misunderstood. Stephen, what was your thought exactly about > what should happen? Perhaps this is more of a bug than I originally thought, given the confusion and general expectation. Here's what we're seeing: postgresql.conf: temp_tablespaces = 'temp_01,temp_02' I have temp file logging on in postgresql.conf, so here's what we see: LOG: temporary file: path "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp9221.4", size 204521472 CONTEXT: SQL statement "create index table_key_idx on table (key) tablespace data_n04" We observe the files being created under $DATA/base/pgsql_tmp/, ignoring the temp tablespaces and not using the tablespace where the index is ultimately created either. I was speculating earlier that it should use one or the other. I'd be perfectly happy if it used one of the temp tablespaces, but currently it's using pg_default regardless of the other settings. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: