Re: default SSL compression (was: libpq compression)
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: default SSL compression (was: libpq compression) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130101190055.GA30438@tornado.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: default SSL compression (was: libpq compression) (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: default SSL compression (was: libpq compression)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:45:54PM +0800, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > Uh. We have the ! notation in our default *now*. What openssl also > > > supports is the text "DEFAULT", which is currently the equivalent of > > > "ALL!aNULL!eNULL". The question, which is valid of course, should be > > > if "DEFAULT" works with all openssl versions. > > > > > > It would seem reasonable it does, but I haven't investigated. The oldest version readily available for download (0.9.1c, 1998) has it. > > Do we want to change our ssl_ciphers default to 'DEFAULT'? Currently it > > is 'ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5:@STRENGTH'. > > > Did we ever get anywhere with this? Is this a change we want to do for 9.3? > Since nobody seems to have come up with a motivation for not following the > openssl default, we probably should? +1 for doing that. I'm not aware of a PostgreSQL-specific selection criterion for SSL cipher suites.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: