Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121227234850.GB31343@alap2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-12-27 18:44:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I am still worried about the following scenario in the EXEC_BACKEND case: > > > 1) postmaster starts > > 2) reads config > > 3) executes _PG_init for shared_preload_libraries > > 4) library 'abc' gets config value 'abc.num_workers = 2' and registers as many workers > > 5) some time goes by, workers, backends start > > 6) abc.num_workers gets changed to 3, SIGHUP > > This is broken whether it's EXEC_BACKEND or not: you don't get to change > anything that determines the number of workers post-startup. > num_workers should have been declared PGC_POSTMASTER. Well, the problem is, a shared library can't do that afaics. abc.num_workers would be using custom_variable_classes (well, whatever its called now, that it doesn't need to be configured). There is no predefined 'num_workers' variable or anything like it in the patch, but I guess some of the module authors will come of up with configuration variables like that. I personally want e.g. 'bdr.databases = 'a, b, c' which obviously has the same problem... Greetings, Andres Freund --Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: