Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121220041223.GD20015@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1 (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:35:11PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > There is another table "ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ" (without ^lob.) > > It is referenced by a foreign key ("rlob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ-@Файл") > > But as I understand it, the problem with the primary key. > > Does the old database have a table with prefix "plob.", called > plob.ВерсияВнешнегоДокумента$Документ? > > If not, if you do pg_dumpall --schema-only --binary-upgrade, is there a > table with that name mentioned? Also, when you say "rlob" above, is the 'r' a Latin letter sound that would look like a Russian 'p' in the error message? (In Cyrillic, a Latin-looking p sounds like Latin-sounding r.) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: