Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121219155646.GA5910@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade (Bernhard Schrader <bernhard.schrader@innogames.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade
Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-12-19 16:51:32 +0100, Bernhard Schrader wrote: > Hello again, > > well, still everything is working. > > What information do you need to get into this issue? > > Well, so far i can say, we dont use ALTER TYPE ADD VALUE. We use some more > or less changed enum_add and enum_del (Which are appended at the end) to be > able to change enums within transactions. That explains everything. You *CANNOT* do that. There are some pretty fundamental reasons why you are not allowed to add enums in a transaction. And even more reasons why deleting from enums isn't allowed at all. Greetings, Andres Freund --Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: