Re: XLByte* usage
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XLByte* usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121217225511.GA8342@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XLByte* usage (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: XLByte* usage
Re: XLByte* usage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-12-17 13:16:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2012-12-17 12:47:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> But, if the day ever comes when 64 bits doesn't seem like enough, I bet > >> we'd move to 128-bit integers, which will surely be available on all > >> platforms by then. So +1 for using plain comparisons --- in fact, I'd > >> vote for running around and ripping out the macros altogether. I had > >> already been thinking of fixing the places that are still using memset > >> to initialize XLRecPtrs to "invalid". > > > I thought about that and had guessed you would be against it because it > > would cause useless diversion of the branches? Otherwise I am all for > > it. > > That's the only argument I can see against doing it --- but Heikki's > patch was already pretty invasive in the same areas this would touch, > so I'm thinking this won't make back-patching much worse. I thought a while about this for while and decided its worth trying to this before the next review round of xlogreader. Even if it causes some breakage there. Doing it this way round seems less likely to introduce bugs, especially if somebody else would go round and do this after the next xlogreader review round but before committing it. Attached is 1) removal of MemSet(&ptr, 0, sizeof(XLogRecPtr) 2) removal of XLByte(EQ|LT|LE|Advance) 3) removal of the dead NextLogPage I noticed along the way In 2) unfortunately one has to make decision in which way to simplify negated XLByte(LT|LE) expressions. I tried to make that choice very careful and when over every change several times after that, so I hope there aren't any bad changes, but more eyeballs are needed. > The notational simplification seems worth it. After doing this: Definitely. Imo some of the conditions are way much easier to read now. Perhaps I am just bad in reading negations though... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: