Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore
От | Cédric Villemain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201212171802.57298.cedric@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le lundi 17 décembre 2012 17:42:04, Tom Lane a écrit : > Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Le lundi 17 décembre 2012 16:45:16, Tom Lane a écrit : > >> Having seen this, I now think .SECONDARY is broken across the board. > > > > make does what it is supposed to do here IIUC. > > Well, it's behaving as documented, but what this means is we need to be > very wary of what contexts we can use .SECONDARY in. I'd just as soon > try to avoid using it at all --- my example with hand-edited gram.c > points out that even rather short dependency chains can have unexpected > misbehaviors if the intermediate files are marked .SECONDARY. "touch gram.c" then "make" will build again the affected files. Which is different from "rm gram.c"... A "touch gram.y" will trigger a rebuild of "gram.c" (and "gram.o"). Maybe Makefile has an option to be a little bit more conservative and rebuild any removed intermediate file even if not required. > > What was the consensus when Peter did the change ? > > It was an experiment, nothing more; or at least that's how I saw it. ok. -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: