Re: parallel pg_dump

On Sat, Dec  8, 2012 at 11:13:30AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 12/08/2012 11:01 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 2012-10-15 17:13:10 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>On 10/13/2012 10:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>>On 09/17/2012 10:01 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>>Attached is a rebased version of the parallel pg_dump patch.
> >>>>Attached is another rebased version for the current commitfest.
> >>>These did not apply cleanly, but I have fixed them up. The combined diff
> >>>against git tip is attached. It can also be pulled from my parallel_dump
> >>>branch on <https://github.com/adunstan/postgresql-dev.git> This builds and
> >>>runs OK on Linux, which is a start ...
> >>Well, you would also need this piece if you're applying the patch (sometimes
> >>I forget to do git add ...)
> >The patch is marked as Ready for Committer in the CF app, but at least
> >the whole windows situation seems to be unresolved as of yet?
> >
> >Is anybody working on this? I would *love* to get this...
> >
> >
> 
> 
> I am working on it when I get a chance, but keep getting hammered.
> I'd love somebody else to review it too.

FYI, I will be posting pg_upgrade performance numbers using Unix
processes.  I will try to get the Windows code working but will also
need help.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +