Re: PQconninfo function for libpq
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PQconninfo function for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121127213741.GR4227@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PQconninfo function for libpq (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PQconninfo function for libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 11/27/12 4:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > >> On 11/22/12 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>> I'm thinking it might be a better idea to just have PG_CONNINFO_NORMAL > >>> and PG_CONNINFO_PASSWORD (which still make sense to separate), > >> > >> What is the use case for separating them? > > > > Getting a connection string that doesn't contain sensitive information > > like a password. In order to show it in a dialog box, for example. > > There is already the PQconninfoOption.dispchar field for this purpose. I had the impression that that field would go away with this patch, but then again it might not be worth the compatibility break. I find the dispchar thingy somewhat unsightly. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: