Re: Problem Observed in behavior of Create Index Concurrently and Hot Update
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem Observed in behavior of Create Index Concurrently and Hot Update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121127175509.GB22677@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem Observed in behavior of Create Index Concurrently and Hot Update (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problem Observed in behavior of Create Index Concurrently and Hot Update
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-11-27 12:50:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I vote for introducing wrapper functions/macro to do the > > about-to-be-dropped check, its hard enough to understand as-is. > > Meh. If it's only going to be done in RelationGetIndexList, I'm > not sure that a wrapper macro is worth the trouble. If we needed > the test in multiple places I'd agree, but what other spots do you > see? I don't really see any other querying locations - but such a macro would make the code easier backpatchable when we introduce a third column for the about-to-be-dropped case. Anyway, don't feel all too strongly about it. Greetings, Andres Freund --Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: