Re: 8.4 doc bug for "Incrementally Updated Backups"
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.4 doc bug for "Incrementally Updated Backups" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121126200216.GE23214@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.4 doc bug for "Incrementally Updated Backups" (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:27:41AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:26:48PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > We don't assume people are reading docs from very old versions. > >>> > > >>> > >>> Even if that is the version they are using? It is, after all, still > >>> under maintenance, > >> > >> There are three options for doc patches: > >> > >> 1. patch only git head, meaning the next major release > >> 2. do #1, plus the most recent major released version, e.g. 9.2.X > >> 3. #1, #2, and all major supported released versions > >> > >> In general, #1 is normally for wording clarifications, #2 is for usage > >> clarifications, and #3 is to correct mistakes. Not sure I follow that > >> 100%, but that is what I normally do. > >> > >> Is that process good? Did I not follow it? > > > > It was removed from 9.0 because it was considered to be unreliable. I > > think that unreliable advice about taking backups is a mistake, so it > > should have followed path #3. I guess it is also clarification, but a > > pretty major one. > > I think it can be considered a bugfix, and thus correcting a mistake. > > But in generael, I think we may want to be a bit more aggressive in > backpatching these things. First because people will likely read the > docs for the version that they are using, and thus miss things. But > possibly even more important, because we know that Google (and others) > tend to link to older versions of the docs as search hits before the > newer ones for quite a long time after a release (or forever in some > cases), which makes it even more visible. See my new email; it doesn't appear in 8.4, and I probably checked that at the time. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: