Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20121119184927.GC3252@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-11-19 10:46:37 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 00:13 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote: > > > My mistake...I thought we were more concerned about the cost of > > locking. > > > > I agree, locking many data pages simultaneously could be hazardous. > > > > This requires more thought.Maybe removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE isnt such a > > great idea after all... > > As I said elsewhere in the thread, I'm not planning to introduce any > additional locking. There is already precedent in IndexOnlyNext. Yea, but that precedent is only valid because IOS does check for a MVCC snapshots. Also it doesn't set anything. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: