Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Kevin Grittner escribió:
>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
>>> Also, it doesn't appear that we ever got around to preparing
>>> documentation updates, but I think we definitely need some if
>>> we're going to start throwing errors for things that used to be
>>> allowed. Since Kevin has the most field experience with this
>>> problem, I'd like to nominate him to write some docs ...
>> 
>> OK, will do. The "redo the DELETE and RETURN NULL" workaround is
>> not at all obvious; we should definitely include an example of
>> that.
> 
> Any chance this patch could be pushed soon?
> 
> The problem is that this patch conflicts rather heavily with my FOR
> KEY SHARE patch. I think it makes sense to commit this one first.
> 
> To me, it would be good enough that the code changes go in now; the
> doc patch can wait a little longer.

Sorry I just got to this in wading through backlog. Will push today
without docs and work on docs soon.

-Kevin