Re: Out-of-policy Planet post?

On Mon, Oct  8, 2012 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct  8, 2012 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> WWW,
> >>
> >> "8 New Oracle compatibility features in EnterpriseDB PPAS 9.2 Beta"
> >>
> >> Last I checked, the end result of discussion on this list was that no
> >> blogging about proprietary forks of PostgreSQL was permitted on Planet.
> >>  It's a policy I disagreed with, but if that's our policy, we should
> >> follow it.
> >>
> >> Since Ras seems to be a new blogger, someone from WWW should just inform
> >> him of the policy and remove the post.
> >
> > Yes, I assumed someone had already done that, so I didn't say anything,
> > but I agree.
> 
> Does it actually violate the policy though? It's pretty darn vague...
> I agree it's very much a borderline so somebody should probably send
> him a warning about it, but I'm not sure it's actually a strict
> violation?

Would the post be interesting to anyone not using the EDB commercial
product?  I didn't think it would be.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +