Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121.1179929516@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server (Shachar Shemesh <shachar@shemesh.biz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux
server, but not with windows pg server
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Shachar Shemesh <shachar@shemesh.biz> writes: > Before you explode at me (again :), I'm not arguing that you can do > binary based calculations of decimal numbers without having rounding > errors that come to bite you. I know you can't. What I'm saying is that > we have two cases to consider. In one of them the above is irrelevant, > and in the other I'm not so sure it's true. You're setting up a straw-man argument, though. The real-world problem cases here are not decimal, they are non-IEEE binary floating arithmetic. The typical difference from IEEE is slightly different tradeoffs in number of mantissa bits vs number of exponent bits within a 32- or 64-bit value. I seem to recall also that there are machines that treat the exponent as power-of-16 not power-of-2. So depending on which way the tradeoffs went, the other format will have either more precision or more range than IEEE. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: