Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120926205443.GA27074@tornado.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm marking this patch Ready for Committer. I suggest backpatching it to 9.2; the patch corrects an oversight in 9.2 changes. There's more compatibility value in backpatching than in retaining distinct behavior for 9.2 only. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:32:41AM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > ! if (!superuser()) > { > /* > ! * Since the user is not superuser, check for matching roles. > */ > ! if (proc->roleId != GetUserId()) > ! return SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION; > } I would have collapsed the conditionals and deleted the obvious comment: if (!(superuser() || proc->roleId == GetUserId())) return SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION; The committer can do that if desired; no need for another version. Thanks, nm
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: