Re: Clarification suggestion for 46.4 chapter.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clarification suggestion for 46.4 chapter. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120901160523.GD2969@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clarification suggestion for 46.4 chapter. (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:54:54AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 17.08.2012 05:07, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 02:53:22PM +0300, Dmitriy Igrishin wrote: > >>Hey, > >> > >>The section 46.4 describes the base data types used in messages. > >>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/protocol-message-types.html > >> > >>According to section 46.5 > >>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/protocol-message-formats.html > >>there are cases when Int32 can be negative (e.g. see DataRow(B) message > >>description.) > >> > >>Thus, I would like to suggest to change the description of Int(i) > >>from > >>"An n-bit integer in network byte order ..." > >>to > >>"An n-bit signed integer in network byte order ..." > > > >OK, documentation updated. > > Actually, in some cases the integers are signed, and in others > unsigned. For example, in a Bind('F') message, the number of > parameters is an Int16 according to the docs, but it is treated as > unsigned. The maximum number of parameters is 65535. > > The sentence used to be factually correct, when it didn't mention > whether they're signed or unsigned. If we want to do better than > that, we'd need to go through all the mentions of IntN in the docs > and explicitly say which ones are signed and which ones unsigned. > Perhaps use Uint16 or Uint32 for the unsigned ones. I have reverted the patch until someone is able to correctly designate the values. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: