Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
От | lsq@nym.hush.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120829221659.363196F446@smtp.hushmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes (lsq@nym.hush.com) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi We use standalone mode because we have found that (anecdotally) it completes faster. We do the procedure because it's a scripted operation on servers of different point releases and its easier to always do it than to code for which ones need and which ones don't - same script every time (and we also reindex in a separate step) Thanks On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:24:51 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >lsq@nym.hush.com writes: >> After an upgrade to 8.4.12 from 8.4.10 we vacuum/analyzed the >db. >> Postgres is running in standalone mode at this point. > >Why were you using standalone mode? And why were you using >ignore_system_indexes? This whole procedure seems like overkill >for a routine minor-version update. > >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 WARNING: using index "pg_toast_2619_index" > >> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes > >> I see the warning generated in systable_beginscan_ordered as a >> warning, and then it proceeds to do the work anyway. >> It appears as if this is benign. Is that the case? > >It is unless you have some reason to think that that index is >corrupt... > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: