Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120720162535.GA22450@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:02:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Second, the user files (large) are certainly identical, it is only the > system tables (small) that _might_ be different, so rsync'ing just those > would add the guarantee, but I know of no easy way to rsync just the > system tables. OK, new idea. I said above I didn't know how to copy just the non-user table files (which are not modified by pg_upgrade), but actually, if you use link mode, the user files are the only files with a hard link count of 2. I could create a script that copied from the master to the slave only those files with a link count of one. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: