Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120719160258.GB20583@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:41:29AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > No, the point is they run pg_upgrade on the stopped primary and stopped > > standbys. Are those the same? I am not really sure. > > Of course not. OK, but why? When the clusters are stopped they are the same, you are running the same initdb on both matchines, and running the same pg_upgrade. What would cause the difference, other than the Database System Identifier, which we can deal with? I don't think we can guarantee they are the same, but what would guarantee they are different? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: