Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201206292152.40311.andres@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Posix Shared Mem patch (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi All, In a *very* quick patch I tested using huge pages/MAP_HUGETLB for the mmap'ed memory. That gives around 9.5% performance benefit in a read-only pgbench run (-n -S - j 64 -c 64 -T 10 -M prepared, scale 200, 6GB s_b, 8 cores, 24GB mem). It also saves a bunch of memory per process due to the smaller page table (shared_buffers 6GB): cat /proc/$pid_of_pg_backend/status |grep VmPTE VmPTE: 6252 kB vs VmPTE: 60 kB Additionally it has the advantage that top/ps/... output under linux now looks like: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU%MEM TIME+ COMMAND 10603 andres 20 0 6381m 4924 1952 R 21 0.0 0:28.04 postgres i.e. RES now actually shows something usable... Which is rather nice imo. I don't have the time atm into making this something useable, maybe somebody else want to pick it up? Looks pretty worthwile investing some time. Because of the required setup we sure cannot make this the default but... Greetings, Andres -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: