Re: Naming conventions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Naming conventions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120525012130.GA25444@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Naming conventions (Raymond O'Donnell <rod@iol.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Naming conventions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:08:03AM +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote: > On 15/05/2012 22:50, Scott Briggs wrote: > > So this is purely anecdotal but I'm curious, what's with all the > > different naming conventions? There's psql (for database > > connections), pgsql (used for some dirs like /usr/pgsql-9.1 and this > > mailing list), postgres (user and other references), and postgresql > > (startup scripts). Uh, the original Berkeley project name was postgres, pgsql is used as a short-hand for PostgreSQL, and psql is short for 'PostgreSQL SQL Monitor'. > ... and don't forget (maybe oddest of all) libpq! :-) libpq originally supported Postgres QUEL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUEL_query_languages -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: