Re: Per-Database Roles
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Per-Database Roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120524222154.GN10306@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Per-Database Roles (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Per-Database Roles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:19:12AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > In retrospect, I think the idea of shared catalogs was probably a bad > idea. I think we should have made roles and tablespaces database > objects rather than shared objects, and come up with some ad-hoc > method of representing the set of available databases. But that > decision seems to have been made sometime pre-1996, so the thought of > changing it now is pretty painful, but I can dream... Yes, pre-1996. I think the fact that authentication/user names appear in pg_hba.conf really locked the user name idea into global objects, and we have never really been able to make a dent in that. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: