Re: Draft release notes complete

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:46:56PM -0700, Robert Haas wrote:
> On May 10, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 05/10/2012 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> How about a hybrid: we continue to identify patch authors as now, that is with names attached to the
feature/bugfixdescriptions, and then have a separate section "Other Contributors" to recognize patch reviewers and
otherhelpers?
 
> > 
> > works for me.
> 
> Me, too.

That does not work for me.  There is no practical reason for a list of
names to appear in the release notes.  I suggest if we want to do that
that we remove all names from the release notes (as Tom suggested), and
create a wiki for credit, and link to that from the release
announcement.  That would allow us to put company names in there too.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +