Re: remove dead ports?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: remove dead ports?
Дата
Msg-id 20120503145936.GF21098@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: remove dead ports?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: remove dead ports?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:39:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:29:39PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I propose that we remove support for the following OS ports from our
> > source tree.  They are totally dead, definitely don't work, and/or
> > probably no one remembers what they even were.  The code just bit rots
> > and is in the way of future improvements.
> > 
> > * Dead/remove:
> > 
> > dgux
> > nextstep
> > sunos4
> > svr4
> > ultrix4
> > univel
> > 
> > * Dubious, but keep for now:
> > 
> > bsdi
> 
> I am no longer on bsdi and I bet there are no more existing users
> either.  It can be removed, I think.

Having received no replies on "general" from bsdi users considering
upgrading to 9.2, I have removed the port.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ?