Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120411212948.GT3379@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:14:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > >> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >>> Arguably: > >>> backend_start -> session_start > >>> query_start -> statment_start > > >> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't > >> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now > >> closed and bolted? > > We do still have open issues that include such proposed changes, > so I'd say that "too late" isn't a good argument. However ... > > > Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if > > it is a win or not, but just asking. > > We were talking about renaming columns if we changed their semantics. > I don't think renaming for the sake of a slightly cleaner name will > win us any friends. The "procpid" change was for accuracy, I guess. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: