Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:08:07AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
> >> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
> >> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
> >> > backwards.
> >>
> >> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
> >
> > I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
> > commit this for 9.2.
> 
> Is anyone even working on testing it?

No one I know of.  I am just trying to set expectations that this still
has a long way to go.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +