Re: PostgreSQL - Debian - Processes: postgres: writer process, etc.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL - Debian - Processes: postgres: writer process, etc. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20120214171618.GA20748@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL - Debian - Processes: postgres: writer process, etc. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL - Debian - Processes: postgres: writer process,
etc.
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:05:10AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> What is weird to me is the "COMMAND" column as far as these four processes > >> are concerned. > >> In the "COMMAND "column I would expect a real command, not a description. > >> Can you explain? > > We intentionally change the command string reported by ps for each > postmaster child process, so that you can tell the various processes > apart. If we did not, every postmaster child would show the exact > same command string as the postmaster itself was launched with. > (To get an idea of how useless that is, try looking at "top" sometime > --- on most systems I've worked with, it ignores the changed command > strings, so you can't tell what's what.) I belive the 'c' command in modern versions of top toggles display of the current command string. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: