Re: Page Checksums
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Page Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20111219141409.GA24234@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Page Checksums (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Page Checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Aidan Van Dyk (aidan@highrise.ca) wrote: > But the scary part is you don't know how long *ago* the crash was. > Because a hint-bit-only change w/ a torn-page is a "non event" in > PostgreSQL *DESIGN*, on crash recovery, it doesn't do anything to try > and "scrub" every page in the database. Fair enough, but, could we distinguish these two cases? In other words, would it be possible to detect if a page was torn due to a 'traditional' crash and not complain in that case, but complain if there's a CRC failure and it *doesn't* look like a torn page? Perhaps that's a stretch, but if we can figure out that a page is torn already, then perhaps it's not so far fetched.. Thanks, Stephen (who is no expert on WAL/torn pages/etc)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: