Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201112170125.pBH1PpC07675@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band
Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On that theory, I'm inclined to think that's not really a problem. > We'll go nuts if we refuse to commit anything until it shows a > meaningful win on every imaginable workload, and it seems like this > can't really be worse than the status quo; any case where it is must > be some kind of artifact. We're better of getting rid of as much > ProcArrayLock contention as possible, rather than keeping it around > because there are corner cases where it decreases contention on some > other lock. Interesting conclusion, and it makes sense. Seems once this is applied we will have more places to look for contention improvements. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: