Re: BUG #6067: In PL/pgsql, EXISTS(SELECT ... INTO...) fails
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6067: In PL/pgsql, EXISTS(SELECT ... INTO...) fails |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201111300232.pAU2WgS10262@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6067: In PL/pgsql, EXISTS(SELECT ... INTO...) fails (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6067: In PL/pgsql, EXISTS(SELECT ... INTO...) fails
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: > "David Fetter" <dfetter@vmware.com> writes: > > IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 INTO STRICT i) THEN > > RAISE NOTICE '%', a; > > END IF; > > Umm ... are you just complaining that the error message isn't very > helpful, or are you actually expecting that to do something useful? > If the latter, what exactly? I'm particularly confused by your use > of the STRICT option here, because if we did support that, I would > expect the STRICT to throw an error if there were not exactly one > matching row, making the EXISTS test 100% pointless. > > But the short answer is that we don't support INTO in sub-selects, > and in general I doubt that we ever will, since in most cases the > behavior wouldn't be very well-defined. It might be worth a TODO > to provide a better error message than "syntax error", though. Is it worth documenting, fixing, or adding this to the TODO list? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: