Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 24.11.2011 07:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, that is a heap table. My only guess is that the heap is being
> >> created without binary_upgrade_next_heap_pg_class_oid being set.
> >> Looking at the code, I can't see how the heap could be created without
> >> this happening. Another idea is that pg_dumpall isn't output the proper
> >> value, but again, how is this data type different from the others.
> >
> > I have reproduced the failure and found it was code I added to pg_dump
> > back in 9.0. The code didn't set the index oid for exclusion constraint
> > indexes. Once these were added to the regression tests for range types
> > recently, pg_upgrade threw an error.
> >
> > My assumption is that anyone trying to use an exclusion constraint with
> > pg_upgrade will get the same type of error.
> >
> > Patch attached. Should it be backpatched to 9.0 and 9.1?
>
> If I understood correctly, pg_upgrade of a database with exclusion
> constraints won't work without this patch? In that case, it should be
> backpatched.
Yes, that is my guess. I will test it today or tomorrow. I am
surprised we had _no_ exclusion constraint tests in the regression tests
until now.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +