Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20111124074042.GA2413@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq (Alexander Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq
Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:59:56AM +0200, Alexander Shulgin wrote: > > How would you specifiy a local port/UNIX domain socket? > > Missed that in my previous reply. > > If host part of the URI points to localhost, the UNIX domain socket would be considered by libpq just as if you would pass"-h localhost -p 5433". Uh, no it doesn't. "-h localhost" uses TCP/IP (try it). This is one piece of mysql magic we don't copy. If you want to use the socket you need to specify "-h /tmp" or wherever you keep it. Leaving out the -h parameter also uses UNIX domain sockets. Which does raise the valid question of how to represent that in URI syntax. SQLAlchemy (for example) doesn't try with it's URL syntax, to connect to a non-default UNIX socket, you need to create the URL object directly. How about the "service" option, that's a nice way of handling non-default socket options. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does > not attach much importance to his own thoughts. -- Arthur Schopenhauer
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: